Clay logo

ClayvsZoomInfo

ZoomInfo logo

A data orchestration and AI enrichment platform that pulls from 75+ data providers via waterfall enrichment to build hyper-targeted prospect lists and automate outbound workflows. — An enterprise sales intelligence platform with a proprietary database of 300M+ contacts, deep intent data, and buyer signals for large B2B go-to-market teams.

The Verdict

Clay vs ZoomInfo

Clay and ZoomInfo are fundamentally different tools that are often miscompared — and understanding that distinction is the most important thing a GTM professional can do before committing budget to either platform. **ZoomInfo** is a data provider. It maintains a proprietary database of 300M+ professional contacts and 100M+ companies, enriched with technographic, firmographic, and intent signals. You query ZoomInfo's database directly, export leads, and pipe them into your CRM or sales engagement tool. It's a single-source system — what ZoomInfo has, you get; what it doesn't, you go without. For large enterprise sales teams that need deep buyer intent data, org charts, and compliance-grade data governance, ZoomInfo is a proven infrastructure choice. Its Copilot AI feature adds workflow automation, but it's bounded by ZoomInfo's own data universe. **Clay** is a data orchestration platform. It doesn't maintain its own proprietary contact database. Instead, it connects to 75+ third-party data providers — including ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clearbit, LinkedIn, Hunter.io, and dozens more — and queries them sequentially through a process called **waterfall enrichment**. If Provider A doesn't return a match on an email address, Clay automatically tries Provider B, then Provider C, maximizing match rates while minimizing per-credit cost. Layered on top of this is Claygent, Clay's AI research agent, which can browse the web, read company websites, analyze LinkedIn profiles, and synthesize unstructured data into structured fields — something no static database can replicate. The practical implication: [according to G2 reviewers](https://www.g2.com/compare/clay-com-clay-vs-zoominfo-sales), both platforms deliver value, but for different workflows. ZoomInfo wins when you need a reliable, compliance-audited, single-vendor data supply with strong enterprise support. Clay wins when you need flexible, multi-source enrichment, custom research automation, and cost-efficient outbound prospecting at scale. [As LinkedIn practitioner Matthew Iovanni notes](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/matthewiovanni_claim-clay-is-a-better-data-operations-tool-activity-7305954635104587776-CAeA), "Clay is a much better tool for the vast majority of organizations for outbound prospecting and data requirements than ZoomInfo." That's a strong practitioner signal — and it aligns with the reality that most mid-market and growth-stage teams don't need ZoomInfo's full enterprise data suite and pay a significant premium for features they rarely use. **Our verdict:** For solo founders, SDR teams under 20 reps, RevOps engineers, and growth-stage companies running personalized outbound, **Clay is the superior choice in 2025**. For enterprise organizations with 50+ AEs, complex compliance requirements, and heavy reliance on intent data to prioritize accounts, **ZoomInfo remains defensible**. The smartest power users run both simultaneously — using ZoomInfo as one enrichment source inside Clay's waterfall — extracting the best of both worlds without paying ZoomInfo prices for every enrichment call.

Feature Comparison

Data Enrichment

Feature
Clay
ZoomInfo
Data Source Architecture
Waterfall enrichment across 75+ providers (Apollo, Clearbit, Hunter, Surfe, LinkedIn, PDL, ZoomInfo, and more). Queries providers sequentially until a match is found, maximizing coverage without paying for failed lookups.Winner
Single proprietary database of 300M+ contacts and 100M+ companies. All enrichment pulls from ZoomInfo's own maintained data — no external provider fallback.
Match Rate Optimization
Waterfall model dramatically increases match rates by trying multiple providers per record. If ZoomInfo (as a source in Clay) misses an email, Clay tries Hunter, then Apollo, then Clearbit — all automatically within one workflow.Winner
Fixed match rate tied to ZoomInfo's database coverage. If a contact isn't in their system, there's no fallback — you get a blank field or an enrichment credit wasted.
AI-Powered Research (Unstructured Data)
Claygent, Clay's AI research agent, browses company websites, LinkedIn profiles, news articles, and custom URLs to extract and synthesize unstructured data into structured fields — e.g., 'Does this company use Salesforce?' or 'What is the CEO's stated growth priority this quarter?'Winner
ZoomInfo Copilot uses AI to surface insights from within ZoomInfo's existing structured database — summarizing account activity, generating email drafts, and flagging buying signals. It cannot browse external web sources or research outside its own data universe.
Data Freshness
Freshness depends on the underlying provider queried. Because Clay pulls from live APIs across 75+ sources in real time, data reflects the provider's most recent sync — which varies by source but often catches job changes and company updates faster than static databases.Tie
ZoomInfo's database is continuously updated by its internal data team, community contributors, and email open tracking. However, staleness is a documented complaint on G2 — particularly for SMB contacts and smaller markets where update frequency is lower.Tie
Custom Enrichment Fields
Unlimited custom fields — users can create any column, run any prompt, and populate it from any source or Claygent AI research. Supports highly bespoke data points like 'hiring velocity in engineering over 90 days' or 'recent funding round press release summary.'Winner
Enrichment fields are largely pre-defined by ZoomInfo's data taxonomy — technographics, firmographics, intent topics, org chart positions. Custom fields are limited to what ZoomInfo's data model supports.

Prospecting and List Building

Feature
Clay
ZoomInfo
Search and Filtering
Clay builds lists by importing CSVs, connecting CRM data, or pulling from integrated sources like LinkedIn Sales Navigator and Apollo. Filtering is applied post-import through enrichment columns and conditional logic rather than a native search UI.
ZoomInfo's Advanced Search is a purpose-built, highly granular prospecting interface with 300+ filters including intent topics, technographics, org hierarchy, department headcount, funding events, and more. Best-in-class for raw search power.Winner
Intent Data
Clay does not natively generate intent data. Users can pull intent signals from integrated sources (e.g., Bombora via API, G2 intent, LinkedIn activity) and incorporate them as enrichment columns in a Clay table.
ZoomInfo's intent data engine (powered by Bombora partnership and proprietary tracking) monitors 4,500+ intent topics across millions of B2B websites. This is ZoomInfo's most differentiated capability and a major reason enterprise teams pay premium prices.Winner
ICP Scoring and Segmentation
ICP scoring is built manually using Clay's formula and conditional logic columns. Users define their own scoring model using any enrichment data point — highly flexible but requires setup effort from a RevOps engineer or technical SDR.Tie
ZoomInfo offers native ICP modeling and scoring through its platform, including lookalike modeling against your best customers. Requires less technical setup but offers less customization.Tie

AI Features and Automation

Feature
Clay
ZoomInfo
AI Research Agent
Claygent is Clay's autonomous AI research agent. Given a prompt, it browses the web, visits URLs, reads PDFs, and returns structured answers as table columns. Example: 'Visit this company's careers page and tell me if they are hiring SDRs' — Claygent returns Yes/No + job link, at scale across thousands of rows.Winner
ZoomInfo Copilot generates AI-drafted outreach emails, surfaces account summaries, recommends next actions, and flags intent spikes — all within ZoomInfo's interface. It cannot perform open-web research or access data outside ZoomInfo's database.
Workflow Automation
Clay workflows can be triggered by CRM events, webhook inputs, CSV uploads, or scheduled intervals. Each workflow chains enrichment steps, AI prompts, conditional branches, and push actions to tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, and Slack.Winner
ZoomInfo Workflows automate list refreshes, CRM pushes, and alert triggers when contacts match defined criteria (e.g., funding event + intent spike). Solid for keeping CRM data current and triggering rep alerts, but not programmable like Clay's table logic.
Personalization at Scale
Clay's AI columns allow users to generate hyper-personalized email opening lines, value propositions, or entire email drafts using any combination of enrichment data — company news, LinkedIn activity, tech stack, hiring trends — per row, at scale.Winner
ZoomInfo Copilot generates personalized outreach using ZoomInfo's proprietary signals (intent, company news within their data). Personalization is limited to what ZoomInfo knows — external context (e.g., a prospect's recent podcast appearance) isn't accessible.

Integrations and Ecosystem

Feature
Clay
ZoomInfo
CRM Integrations
Native two-way integrations with HubSpot and Salesforce. Can push enriched data to any CRM via webhooks or Zapier. Supports pulling existing CRM records into Clay tables for re-enrichment.
Deep, certified integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics, and other major CRMs. ZoomInfo's CRM sync is enterprise-grade with field mapping, deduplication logic, and admin controls that Clay's integration doesn't match in sophistication.Winner
Data Provider Integrations
75+ native data provider integrations including ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clearbit, Hunter, LinkedIn, People Data Labs, Surfe, Datagma, Snov.io, Crunchbase, and more — all accessible within a single Clay table.Winner
ZoomInfo is the data provider. Its integrations are focused on consuming data downstream (CRMs, SEPs, MAPs) rather than pulling from other data sources.
Sales Engagement Platform (SEP) Integrations
Integrates with Outreach, Salesloft, Smartlead, Instantly, Lemlist, and others to push enriched contacts and personalized copy directly into sequences. Clay acts as the enrichment layer upstream of your SEP.Tie
ZoomInfo integrates with Outreach, Salesloft, SalesLoft, and other SEPs. Also has a native Engage module for email sequencing built into the platform — reducing the need for a separate SEP tool.Tie

Pricing and Accessibility

Feature
Clay
ZoomInfo
Pricing Model
Credit-based pricing across four tiers (Free, Starter, Explorer, Pro, Enterprise). Credits are consumed per enrichment action — unused credits roll over monthly. Transparent pricing published on website.Winner
Annual contract pricing negotiated per deal — no public pricing. Typically sold as seat-based licenses with minimum contract commitments. Buyers report high-pressure sales tactics and significant price variance by company size.
Minimum Commitment
Free plan available with 100 monthly credits. Paid plans start at $149/month on monthly billing. No long-term contract required at lower tiers.Winner
ZoomInfo requires annual contracts, typically starting at $15,000–$25,000/year for small team licenses and scaling to $50,000–$100,000+/year for enterprise plans. No monthly billing option.
Cost Efficiency for SMBs
A 3-person SDR team running 10,000 enrichments/month on Clay's Pro plan ($800/month) pays roughly $0.08 per enrichment — and only pays for successful lookups in the waterfall model, not failed attempts across providers.Winner
A 3-person SDR team on a ZoomInfo Professional license would typically pay $15,000–$24,000/year ($1,250–$2,000/month) for comparable contact volume — with no credit refund for unmatched records and opaque overage fees.

Compliance and Data Governance

Feature
Clay
ZoomInfo
GDPR / CCPA Compliance
Clay's compliance posture depends on the underlying data providers used in each waterfall. Clay itself provides tools to suppress records and honor opt-outs but doesn't centrally certify the compliance of all 75+ providers it connects to.
ZoomInfo offers enterprise-grade compliance infrastructure including GDPR, CCPA, and SOC 2 Type II certifications, plus a dedicated data privacy compliance team. However, ZoomInfo has faced significant legal scrutiny over its data collection practices (see ZoomInfo lawsuit section).Winner
Data Privacy Legal Risk
Clay's risk profile varies by provider. Using established providers like ZoomInfo or Apollo within Clay carries the same compliance posture as using those providers directly.Winner
ZoomInfo has faced class-action lawsuits in multiple U.S. states (Illinois, California, Ohio) alleging violations of right-of-publicity laws for using people's names, likenesses, and professional data for commercial purposes without consent. This represents a documented legal risk for enterprise procurement teams to evaluate.

Pricing Comparison

Clay

Free

$0/mo
  • 100 credits/month
  • Access to 75+ data providers
  • Basic Clay tables
  • Limited Claygent AI rows
  • Community support only

Starter

$149/mo
  • 2,000 credits/month
  • Access to all 75+ data providers
  • Full waterfall enrichment
  • Claygent AI research agent
  • HubSpot and Salesforce integrations
  • Email support

Explorer

$349/mo
  • 10,000 credits/month
  • All Starter features
  • Advanced AI columns and prompts
  • Webhook triggers
  • Priority support

Pro

$800/mo
  • 50,000 credits/month
  • All Explorer features
  • Custom credit rollover policies
  • Team seats included
  • Dedicated onboarding support
  • Advanced workflow automation

Enterprise

Custom
  • Unlimited or negotiated credit volume
  • Custom data provider agreements
  • SSO and advanced admin controls
  • SLA-backed support
  • Custom integrations and API access
  • Dedicated customer success manager

ZoomInfo

Professional

~$15,000–$25,000/year (estimated, not publicly listed)
  • Contact and company database access (300M+ contacts)
  • Advanced Search with 300+ filters
  • Basic intent data (limited topics)
  • CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot)
  • Bulk export credits
  • Phone and email contact data

Advanced

~$25,000–$50,000/year (estimated, not publicly listed)
  • All Professional features
  • Full Bombora intent data (4,500+ topics)
  • ZoomInfo Copilot AI features
  • Org chart data and contact hierarchy
  • Technographic data
  • Website visitor tracking (FormComplete, WebSights)
  • Conversation intelligence (Chorus integration)

Elite

~$50,000–$100,000+/year (estimated, not publicly listed)
  • All Advanced features
  • Custom seat counts for large teams
  • Full API access
  • Advanced compliance and data governance tools
  • Dedicated account management
  • Custom data integrations
  • Enhanced SLA and enterprise support

Use Case Recommendations

Solo founder or 1-2 person sales team doing cold outbound

Clay

For a solo founder or tiny team, ZoomInfo's $15,000+ annual minimum is a non-starter — it represents a significant percentage of an early-stage company's entire sales budget. Clay's Starter plan at $149/month gives access to the same underlying data (including ZoomInfo as an optional source) through the waterfall enrichment model. A solo founder can build a list from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, enrich emails and phone numbers via Clay's waterfall, use Claygent to research each prospect's specific pain points, generate personalized first lines with an AI column, and push directly to Instantly or Smartlead — all within a single Clay workflow. The total tech stack cost for this workflow is under $500/month, compared to ZoomInfo alone at $1,250+/month on the cheapest annual plan. Clay wins decisively for resource-constrained operators who need flexibility over a single data moat.

Mid-market SDR team (5–15 reps) scaling outbound prospecting

Clay

A 5–15 person SDR team is exactly the sweet spot where Clay delivers maximum ROI versus ZoomInfo. The team needs volume (thousands of enriched contacts per month), personalization (to stand out in crowded inboxes), and flexibility (different ICPs require different data sources). Clay's Pro plan at $800/month handles 50,000 enrichments per month — enough to supply a 10-rep team with 5,000 contacts each at roughly $0.16 per fully enriched record. Waterfall enrichment means the team isn't paying for failed lookups, and Claygent can automate research tasks that would otherwise take hours of manual SDR time (e.g., 'check if this prospect tweeted about their pain point in the last 30 days'). ZoomInfo at this team size would cost $30,000–$50,000/year with a more rigid data model. [G2 reviewers confirm](https://www.g2.com/compare/clay-com-clay-vs-zoominfo-sales) that both tools have strengths, but for SDR-led outbound at scale, Clay's workflow flexibility is a material advantage.

Enterprise sales team (50+ AEs) with account-based selling and intent data requirements

ZoomInfo

This is ZoomInfo's home turf. An enterprise sales team running a disciplined account-based selling (ABS) motion needs three things Clay cannot provide natively: proprietary intent data at scale (4,500+ Bombora topics monitoring millions of B2B sites), deep org chart data for multi-threaded enterprise deals, and enterprise-grade compliance infrastructure that passes procurement review. ZoomInfo's intent engine is genuinely differentiated — when a target account surges on 'enterprise CRM migration' intent topics, ZoomInfo surfaces that signal before competitors do. For a 50-AE team where each rep is covering 100 strategic accounts, that real-time intent prioritization can materially move win rates. ZoomInfo also offers Chorus conversation intelligence and a native sales engagement module, reducing the number of point solutions needed. At this scale, the $50,000–$100,000 annual cost amortizes favorably per seat. Clay can supplement but cannot replace ZoomInfo's core value here.

RevOps engineer building automated enrichment workflows for CRM hygiene

Clay

RevOps engineers are Clay's power users, and CRM hygiene is one of the clearest Clay wins. A common workflow: pull all contacts from Salesforce where email_valid = false or last_modified > 365 days, run them through Clay's waterfall enrichment to find updated emails and phone numbers, score them against a custom ICP formula, and push only qualified, enriched records back to Salesforce — automatically, on a weekly schedule. This workflow would cost a fraction of what ZoomInfo charges for bulk enrichment credits, and it's fully auditable in Clay's table view. Claygent can even flag records where the company has been acquired, merged, or shut down — keeping the CRM clean at a level of intelligence that ZoomInfo's static database struggles to match for long-tail companies and SMBs.

Growth team running Clay and ZoomInfo simultaneously

Clay

Contrary to the either/or framing of most comparison content, many sophisticated growth teams run Clay and ZoomInfo simultaneously — and this is arguably the optimal setup for teams with budget for both. The workflow: use ZoomInfo's Advanced Search to build a high-quality seed list using intent data and 300+ filters (ZoomInfo's strongest capability), export that list into Clay, then run Clay's waterfall enrichment to fill gaps in mobile numbers, personal emails, and custom research fields that ZoomInfo doesn't cover. Claygent can then layer unstructured research on top — visiting each company's website, pulling recent news, identifying specific hiring signals — before the record gets pushed to your SEP with a personalized AI-generated email. This combined workflow extracts ZoomInfo's database strength while leveraging Clay's orchestration and AI capabilities, resulting in higher deliverability, better personalization, and more complete records than either tool alone. [As noted on G2](https://www.g2.com/compare/clay-com-clay-vs-zoominfo-sales), users who get the most value from both platforms tend to be those using them as complementary rather than competing tools.

Compliance-sensitive enterprise evaluating data sourcing risk

ZoomInfo

For procurement teams with strict legal review processes — particularly in regulated industries like financial services, healthcare, or legal — ZoomInfo's compliance certifications (SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance program, CCPA adherence) provide a documented vendor risk profile that Clay's multi-provider architecture makes harder to certify uniformly. That said, procurement teams should be aware that ZoomInfo has faced class-action lawsuits in multiple U.S. states (Illinois, California, Ohio) alleging violations of right-of-publicity laws for monetizing professional data without individual consent. These lawsuits are ongoing and represent a reputational and legal risk that procurement teams should investigate before signing long-term ZoomInfo contracts. Neither tool is without compliance complexity, but ZoomInfo's single-vendor structure at least gives legal teams a single contract and DPA to review.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core difference between Clay and ZoomInfo?
Clay is a data orchestration platform that connects to 75+ third-party data providers and queries them through a waterfall enrichment model — it does not maintain its own contact database. ZoomInfo is a data provider with a proprietary database of 300M+ contacts. The architectural difference matters: ZoomInfo gives you one database with high depth; Clay gives you access to many databases simultaneously, maximizing match rates and enabling AI-powered research through its Claygent agent. Most modern outbound teams benefit more from Clay's flexibility, while large enterprise teams doing account-based selling often need ZoomInfo's intent data and org chart depth.
Does Clay integrate with ZoomInfo — can you use both together?
Yes — ZoomInfo is one of Clay's 75+ native data provider integrations. This means you can use ZoomInfo as one enrichment source within Clay's waterfall, querying it first and falling back to other providers (Apollo, Clearbit, Hunter, etc.) if ZoomInfo doesn't return a match. Many sophisticated GTM teams use this setup: they build seed lists using ZoomInfo's Advanced Search and intent data (ZoomInfo's strength), then run those lists through Clay to fill enrichment gaps, add custom research via Claygent, and generate personalized messaging — getting the best of both tools. So 'Clay vs ZoomInfo' is often a false choice; they can be complementary.
Does Clay use ZoomInfo data?
Yes, Clay can use ZoomInfo as one of its data sources within a waterfall enrichment workflow — but only if you have a ZoomInfo subscription and connect it to Clay via API. Clay doesn't resell or include ZoomInfo data by default. When ZoomInfo is connected, Clay will query it as one step in the waterfall sequence, counting against your ZoomInfo credits or export limits as defined by your ZoomInfo contract. If you don't have a ZoomInfo subscription, Clay uses its other 70+ providers instead.
Is Clay better than ZoomInfo for outbound prospecting?
For most modern outbound use cases — particularly for teams under 50 reps — Clay is a better choice than ZoomInfo as a standalone tool. Clay's waterfall enrichment delivers higher match rates across a broader set of providers, its Claygent AI agent automates research tasks no static database can replicate, and its credit-based pricing model is dramatically more accessible than ZoomInfo's annual contracts. [LinkedIn practitioners agree](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/matthewiovanni_claim-clay-is-a-better-data-operations-tool-activity-7305954635104587776-CAeA) that Clay outperforms ZoomInfo for the vast majority of organizations doing outbound prospecting. ZoomInfo retains advantages in native intent data and enterprise compliance infrastructure.
Who are ZoomInfo's biggest competitors?
ZoomInfo's biggest direct competitors in the sales intelligence database space are Apollo.io, Cognism, Lusha, Clearbit (now part of HubSpot), Seamless.AI, and LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Apollo is ZoomInfo's most direct SMB competitor, offering similar contact databases at lower price points. Cognism is a strong competitor in European markets with superior GDPR compliance. Clay is less a direct database competitor to ZoomInfo and more of a layer that sits above all these providers — orchestrating them together. For enterprise buyers, Salesforce Data Cloud and Demandbase are also relevant alternatives in the broader B2B intelligence category.
Who competes with Clay?
Clay's most direct competitors are tools that attempt to combine multi-source data enrichment with workflow automation: Ocean.io, Phantombuster, and to some extent n8n or Make (for the workflow automation component). In the AI research agent space, tools like Browse AI, Bardeen, and Magical compete with Claygent's web research capabilities. For enrichment specifically, Clearbit, Apollo, and Surfe compete on individual provider quality. However, no single tool currently replicates Clay's full combination of 75+ provider waterfall enrichment, AI research agents, and spreadsheet-style workflow logic in one platform — which is Clay's primary competitive moat.
What is the lawsuit against ZoomInfo?
ZoomInfo has faced multiple class-action lawsuits in U.S. states including Illinois, California, and Ohio. The core allegation across these cases is that ZoomInfo violated right-of-publicity laws by using individuals' names, professional likenesses, job titles, and biographical information for commercial purposes — specifically, using that data as a marketing teaser in free search results to entice paying subscriptions — without obtaining individual consent. Illinois's Right of Publicity Act (IRPA) is particularly relevant given its broad protections. These cases are ongoing and have not all been resolved. For enterprise procurement teams, these lawsuits represent a legal and reputational risk factor when evaluating ZoomInfo as a primary data vendor, particularly if your organization operates in states with strong privacy legislation or in regulated industries with heightened data governance requirements.
What does Clay AI (Claygent) actually do?
Claygent is Clay's AI research agent — a GPT-powered autonomous researcher that can browse live websites, read company pages, analyze LinkedIn profiles, pull from news sources, and return structured answers as columns in a Clay table. Practical examples: (1) 'Visit this company's /careers page and tell me if they are hiring in sales' — returns Yes/No + job URL per row at scale. (2) 'Summarize the most recent funding announcement for this company from TechCrunch or Crunchbase' — returns a one-sentence summary per row. (3) 'Based on this person's LinkedIn profile, write a personalized cold email opening line referencing a specific recent post or career transition.' Claygent executes these prompts across thousands of rows automatically, turning manual research that would take hours into a column that populates in minutes. This is categorically different from ZoomInfo Copilot, which only works with data ZoomInfo already has in its database.
How does Clay's waterfall enrichment work and why does it matter?
Waterfall enrichment is Clay's core architectural innovation. Instead of querying a single data provider for a contact's email or phone number, Clay queries multiple providers sequentially — starting with the cheapest or most likely to match, and moving to the next provider only if the previous one returns no result. For example: Clay might try Hunter.io first (cheapest), then Apollo, then ZoomInfo, then People Data Labs — stopping as soon as it finds a valid email. This matters for two reasons: (1) Match rates are dramatically higher because you're not limited to any single provider's database coverage, and (2) Cost is optimized because you only consume credits from providers that return a match, not from every failed lookup. A ZoomInfo-only enrichment run on 10,000 contacts might return emails for 60–70% of records and charge for all 10,000. Clay's waterfall might achieve 85%+ match rates and only charge for successful lookups across the cascade.
How does ZoomInfo Copilot compare to Clay's Claygent AI?
ZoomInfo Copilot and Clay's Claygent serve similar goals — reducing manual research work through AI — but operate in fundamentally different ways. ZoomInfo Copilot works within ZoomInfo's closed data universe: it summarizes account activity, drafts outreach emails using ZoomInfo signals (intent, technographics, company news within their database), and recommends next actions for reps. It cannot access data outside ZoomInfo's database. Clay's Claygent is an open-web AI research agent — it browses any URL, reads any publicly available page, and synthesizes information that exists nowhere in a structured database. For personalization based on a prospect's recent podcast appearance, a specific blog post they wrote, or a niche industry event they attended, Claygent can find and use that data; Copilot cannot. For teams whose ICP is well-covered by ZoomInfo's database and whose personalization needs are met by structured signals, Copilot adds genuine value. For teams that need contextual, unstructured research at scale, Claygent is in a different category.

Find the Right GTM Stack with Maestro

Stop guessing which tools to use. Maestro analyzes your GTM workflow and recommends the best-fit tools for your team.

Try Maestro Free